Behind the call is a government ambition to offer
tax cuts at the next election to reverse some of the
“bracket creep” that will force 300,000 workers to
pay higher rates over the next two years as
inflation pushes up their incomes. The Coalition
strategy will be central to the election campaign as
Tony Abbott and the Treasurer seek to offer a “low
tax” pledge to justify unpopular spending cuts and
contrast their fiscal policy with Labor’s spending
plans.
The cost of reform is daunting, given Treasury
estimates that it would cost $25bn over five years
to return all of the “bracket creep” — the increase
in the tax take when inflation lifts workers into
higher brackets even when their real incomes do not
change.
Mr Hockey is warning of a wider economic challenge
from the tax pressures on workers because
Australia’s top marginal tax rate is higher than the
average across advanced economies. Workers pay 45c
in the dollar on earnings over $180,000 but this
rises to 47c when the Medicare levy is added and
reaches 49c as a result of the government’s
temporary budget repair levy, which stops in July
2017.
The pressures are also hurting workers on incomes of
about $80,000 — the threshold at which they begin to
pay 37c in the dollar for every dollar they earn.
Treasury estimates to be outlined by Mr Hockey today
show the proportion of taxpayers in the top two tax
brackets will rise from 27 per cent today to 43 per
cent a decade from now.
“Our personal income tax revenue is subject to
unsustainable risk,” the Treasurer writes. “For
example, the top 10 per cent of individual taxpayers
pay nearly half the personal income tax collected by
the government.
This is an over-reliance and dependence on a narrow
base that is increasingly mobile, to support our
vital social infrastructure.” Workers paid $185bn in
personal income taxes last year and this part of
federal revenue is expected to swell to more than
$230bn by 2019.
Company tax receipts will be $86bn in 2019 and GST
receipts will be $68bn according to this year’s
budget papers. Government sources indicated
yesterday the Coalition was aiming to go to the
election with plans to ease the tax burden,
including personal income tax cuts, but that the
timeframe remained subject to the budget bottom
line.
Mr Hockey does not promise a tax cut but makes it
clear he wants reforms — including spending
restraint — to enable the cuts. Asked last month if
there was hope the government would cut marginal tax
rates before the election, he said: “Well, not
before the next election, but certainly we’ll be
taking a proposal to the Australian people at the
next election.’’
The Treasurer’s comments on the overall tax burden
reignite a fight with Labor over which side of
politics delivers low taxes, given the budget papers
forecast that tax receipts as a proportion of
economic output will rise from 21.9 per cent last
year to 23.4 per cent by June 2019. Tax as a
proportion of gross domestic output was lower when
Labor was in power, hitting a trough of 19.9 per
cent in 2010 as the global financial crisis wiped
out some of the revenue Treasury had been counting
on. Mr Hockey states that when personal income tax
is calculated as a proportion of total tax revenue,
the tax level is the second highest in the OECD, the
group of advanced economies.
“We must aim to reduce the overall tax burden on the
community and work to promote stronger economic
growth,” Mr Hockey states. Part of the Treasurer’s
tax reform call is an argument for a change to the
federation to ensure the power to raise taxes
matches the obligation to spend on services.
At the moment, state governments raise only a
fraction of the revenue they need to fund health and
education and other services, forcing them to rely
on the GST and payments from Canberra. Mr Hockey’s
reform principles include the requirement that “as
best as possible, the revenue-raising capacity of
each tier of government should be aligned to
responsibilities of funding and service delivery”.
That goal could be pursued by raising GST and
sharing the higher proceeds with the states so they
have greater capacity to pay for their own services.
While NSW Premier Mike Baird has suggested an
increase in the GST to 15 per cent, Queensland
Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk and Victorian Premier
Daniel Andrews have proposed an increase in the
Medicare levy instead. The Prime Minister has said
he would prefer the GST option to the Medicare
increase. Mr Hockey’s comments today support that
view, given that a higher Medicare levy would
increase the income tax burden and worsen the
“unsustainable risk” the Treasurer identifies.
Source:
THE AUSTRALIAN, dated 10/08/2015. |